<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Arjun Basu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arjunbasu.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arjunbasu.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:20:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Cry for the Publishers (though you are free to shake your head) by Punit Dhandhania</title>
		<link>http://arjunbasu.com/archives/dont-cry-for-the-publishers-though-you-are-free-to-shake-your-head#comment-2409</link>
		<dc:creator>Punit Dhandhania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arjunbasu.com/?p=6255#comment-2409</guid>
		<description>Though I fully agree with the views in this article, I would like to highlight (and perhaps only in support of the points made in the article) that the book or text publishing industry is very different from the music and video publishing industry:

Music and video publishing industry makes products that we consume pretty much in a single linear manner. Whereas the text consumption (perhaps less in trade books) is more complex. We search. We research. We refer. We relate or hyperlink. We reflect and in so doing carry out number of analyses.

We consume music and video products several times (more music than video). Whereas for text we need to keep reading new stuff continually to increase our knowledge or do our research or even to get entertained.

If the text publishers can build business models around these differences then they need not go down the same route as music publishers.

Though it is a happy situation that authors (and readers) do not have to depend on the judgement of a few to see their work published and read. Vive indie publishing. But also vive traditional publishing values. Vive la difference. Vive publishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I fully agree with the views in this article, I would like to highlight (and perhaps only in support of the points made in the article) that the book or text publishing industry is very different from the music and video publishing industry:</p>
<p>Music and video publishing industry makes products that we consume pretty much in a single linear manner. Whereas the text consumption (perhaps less in trade books) is more complex. We search. We research. We refer. We relate or hyperlink. We reflect and in so doing carry out number of analyses.</p>
<p>We consume music and video products several times (more music than video). Whereas for text we need to keep reading new stuff continually to increase our knowledge or do our research or even to get entertained.</p>
<p>If the text publishers can build business models around these differences then they need not go down the same route as music publishers.</p>
<p>Though it is a happy situation that authors (and readers) do not have to depend on the judgement of a few to see their work published and read. Vive indie publishing. But also vive traditional publishing values. Vive la difference. Vive publishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Cry for the Publishers (though you are free to shake your head) by Erin</title>
		<link>http://arjunbasu.com/archives/dont-cry-for-the-publishers-though-you-are-free-to-shake-your-head#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arjunbasu.com/?p=6255#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the publishing field is going to be dying any time soon. The fact that e-books are becoming more commonplace isn&#039;t going hurt publishers; it means that publishers will continue to publish books in that way. Plus, there will always be a market for people who don&#039;t want to buy e-books, especially in academic fields, where actual textbooks are more preferred over e-books. And realistically, very few people are able to self-publish their books electronically and be successful. Those people still need publishers to advertise their books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the publishing field is going to be dying any time soon. The fact that e-books are becoming more commonplace isn&#8217;t going hurt publishers; it means that publishers will continue to publish books in that way. Plus, there will always be a market for people who don&#8217;t want to buy e-books, especially in academic fields, where actual textbooks are more preferred over e-books. And realistically, very few people are able to self-publish their books electronically and be successful. Those people still need publishers to advertise their books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don&#8217;t Cry for the Publishers (though you are free to shake your head) by D. T. Gray</title>
		<link>http://arjunbasu.com/archives/dont-cry-for-the-publishers-though-you-are-free-to-shake-your-head#comment-2303</link>
		<dc:creator>D. T. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arjunbasu.com/?p=6255#comment-2303</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry bro, I&#039;m already laughing. I never even thought of napster or the video industry. I simply forgot about them. But you make a very good point; for them to not have anyone (overpaid enough) to notice something like this is... well kind of silly.

Good luck on your book. I&#039;ve self published myself, but it is a lot of work, so I submit some of my other material out as well, but these are troubling times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry bro, I&#8217;m already laughing. I never even thought of napster or the video industry. I simply forgot about them. But you make a very good point; for them to not have anyone (overpaid enough) to notice something like this is&#8230; well kind of silly.</p>
<p>Good luck on your book. I&#8217;ve self published myself, but it is a lot of work, so I submit some of my other material out as well, but these are troubling times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Small Publishing House to Multinational by Bronwyn McBride</title>
		<link>http://arjunbasu.com/archives/from-small-publishing-house-to-multinational#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator>Bronwyn McBride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arjunbasu.com/?p=5969#comment-2265</guid>
		<description>Hi! 

I finally visited your blog through Twitter. 

I liked this post, and the story of how you first found the job with Tundra Books, the work you did with them, and how you continued from there. The Hockey Sweater was one of my favourite stories as a child. 

This is a small story with a bigger metaphor. Glad I found your blog: I&#039;ll be following!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! </p>
<p>I finally visited your blog through Twitter. </p>
<p>I liked this post, and the story of how you first found the job with Tundra Books, the work you did with them, and how you continued from there. The Hockey Sweater was one of my favourite stories as a child. </p>
<p>This is a small story with a bigger metaphor. Glad I found your blog: I&#8217;ll be following!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;His tweets cannot possibly work as stories&#8221; by Arjun Basu</title>
		<link>http://arjunbasu.com/archives/his-tweets-cannot-possibly-work-as-stories#comment-2108</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun Basu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arjunbasu.com/?p=6249#comment-2108</guid>
		<description>Peter, you are correct, of course. Nothing wrong with that line at all. It is, perhaps, the point of the entire exercise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, you are correct, of course. Nothing wrong with that line at all. It is, perhaps, the point of the entire exercise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;His tweets cannot possibly work as stories&#8221; by peter darbyshire</title>
		<link>http://arjunbasu.com/archives/his-tweets-cannot-possibly-work-as-stories#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>peter darbyshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 05:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arjunbasu.com/?p=6249#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>Nothing wrong with &quot;catalysts to the reader’s imagination.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing wrong with &#8220;catalysts to the reader’s imagination.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Male (Writer) Conundrum by Mark Lepage</title>
		<link>http://arjunbasu.com/archives/the-male-writer-conundrum#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lepage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arjunbasu.com/?p=6156#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>Enough with the worthy prairie oatmeal memoirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough with the worthy prairie oatmeal memoirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Male (Writer) Conundrum by Arjun Basu</title>
		<link>http://arjunbasu.com/archives/the-male-writer-conundrum#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjun Basu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arjunbasu.com/?p=6156#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>Not planning on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not planning on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Male (Writer) Conundrum by Rachel Thompson</title>
		<link>http://arjunbasu.com/archives/the-male-writer-conundrum#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arjunbasu.com/?p=6156#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>I was told a few things: 1) humor, non-fiction will never sell (my second collection of essays just outsold and outranked GO THE FUCK TO SLEEP) on Amazon; 2) I must stay branded and not move out of my genre -- which is why my next book is going to be fiction 3) I should never write fiction. 

Fuck off is write, er, right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was told a few things: 1) humor, non-fiction will never sell (my second collection of essays just outsold and outranked GO THE FUCK TO SLEEP) on Amazon; 2) I must stay branded and not move out of my genre &#8212; which is why my next book is going to be fiction 3) I should never write fiction. </p>
<p>Fuck off is write, er, right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Male (Writer) Conundrum by TJ Radcliffe</title>
		<link>http://arjunbasu.com/archives/the-male-writer-conundrum#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Radcliffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arjunbasu.com/?p=6156#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why do we write poetry anymore?&quot;

Because we must.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why do we write poetry anymore?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because we must.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

